Difference between revisions of "Advanced Governance Diagnostics"

From FairShares Wiki 3.x
Jump to: navigation, search
(Advanced Governance Diagnostics - create page)
 
m (Introduction)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
  Documentation on now to interpret the results of the '''Advanced Governance DiagnosticsA''' will appear here.
+
You can try out the FairShares Advanced Governance Diagnostics by visiting the website of the [http://www.fairshares.coop/wordpress/advanced-governance-diagnostics/ FairShares Association].
 +
 
 +
==Introduction==
 +
 
 +
[[File:FSD-Small-PNG.png|120px||right]]The FairShares Association’s governance auditing and diagnostic tools were strongly influenced by longitudinal studies and academic articles written at Sheffield Hallam University.
 +
 
 +
Key works include:
 +
 
 +
* Ridley-Duff, R. J. (2005) ''Communitarian Perspectives on Corporate Governance'', Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam University. [http://shura.shu.ac.uk/2681/]
 +
 
 +
* Ridley-Duff, R. J. (2007) “Communitarian Perspectives on Social Enterprise”, ''Corporate Governance: an International Review'', 15(2): 382-392. [http://shura.shu.ac.uk/721/]
 +
 
 +
* Coule, T. (2008) ''Strategies for Sustainability in the Voluntary Sector'', Unpublished PhD Thesis, Sheffield Hallam University.
 +
 
 +
* Chadwick-Coule, T (2011). Social dynamics and the strategy process : bridging or creating a divide between trustees and staff?, ''Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly'', 40 (1): 33-56.
 +
 
 +
The advanced diagnostics are comprehensive – you’ll need 30 – 45 minutes to do them. They are designed as both CPD tools to develop individuals' capacity, and as aids for organisation development so that governing bodies / social entrepreneurs can advance thinking from [[FairShares Model]] – Level 1 (Coaching/Social Audit) towards Levels 2 (Design and Development) and 3 (Reconstituting the Enterprise).  The diagnostics collect stakeholder perspectives on the governance principles that are operating in a selected organisation.
 +
 
 +
==Interpreting Results==
 +
 
 +
Documentation on how to interpret the results of the '''Advanced Governance Diagnostics''' will appear here.
  
  

Latest revision as of 11:15, 28 January 2019

You can try out the FairShares Advanced Governance Diagnostics by visiting the website of the FairShares Association.

Introduction

FSD-Small-PNG.png
The FairShares Association’s governance auditing and diagnostic tools were strongly influenced by longitudinal studies and academic articles written at Sheffield Hallam University.

Key works include:

  • Ridley-Duff, R. J. (2005) Communitarian Perspectives on Corporate Governance, Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam University. [1]
  • Ridley-Duff, R. J. (2007) “Communitarian Perspectives on Social Enterprise”, Corporate Governance: an International Review, 15(2): 382-392. [2]
  • Coule, T. (2008) Strategies for Sustainability in the Voluntary Sector, Unpublished PhD Thesis, Sheffield Hallam University.
  • Chadwick-Coule, T (2011). Social dynamics and the strategy process : bridging or creating a divide between trustees and staff?, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40 (1): 33-56.

The advanced diagnostics are comprehensive – you’ll need 30 – 45 minutes to do them. They are designed as both CPD tools to develop individuals' capacity, and as aids for organisation development so that governing bodies / social entrepreneurs can advance thinking from FairShares Model – Level 1 (Coaching/Social Audit) towards Levels 2 (Design and Development) and 3 (Reconstituting the Enterprise). The diagnostics collect stakeholder perspectives on the governance principles that are operating in a selected organisation.

Interpreting Results

Documentation on how to interpret the results of the Advanced Governance Diagnostics will appear here.



Return to FairShares Diagnostics

Return to Main Page